Press enter to search, esc to close
The moment I decided to the take the plunge into the EV ownership pool – or perhaps more accurately, to dip a toe in the shallow end – came on a Friday in March 2019.
The day before I had to do a presentation to a roomful of people about legal issues to do with electric vehicle charging installation (EVCI) projects. I had decided there is only so much you can say, without quickly losing your audience, if you limit yourself to topics like the difference between leases and licences or the detail of obtaining new grid connections. So in an attempt to provide some wider context, I spent several happy hours in preparation for the session, indulging my own lifelong interest in car facts, looking at various bits of data relating to fuelled cars and electric cars. On the back of this, I felt I could confidently say to the attendees that, as a broad rule of thumb, you could expect an EV to have a lifetime carbon footprint that is around a third lower than an equivalent petrol/diesel model – and that this whole-life emissions gap between EVs and fuelled cars would likely only increase as electricity grids continue to de-carbonise with more and more renewable energy generation coming on stream.
If work for the Thursday presentation reinforced the cold rationale for switching to EVs, a lunchtime meeting the following day with an EVCI developer client provided some extra, more emotive support for making the switch. The talk over that lunch was very much about how great electric cars can be to drive and the kind of customer experience you could expect to enjoy when visiting one of their futuristic new charging sites.
Five days later my wife and I swapped the small petrol-fuelled car we used for local trips in and around Bristol for a second hand EV. And if you had asked me in the honeymoon period in the weeks after we first bought the EV whether we would also switch our larger, diesel car to electric in the not too distant future, I would have said, yes, very likely we would.
However, more than two years on, we are still just doing local journeys on lower carbon electric power, with most long journeys still being fuelled by diesel. Why? Primarily because we don’t have our own off-street parking and so don’t have any way of installing our own proper charge point at home.
Compared with someone who lives in a block of flats, say, we are lucky that we can at least string an extension cable from a plug socket in the hallway of our mid-terrace house, out over the pavement, and into our car when we are able to park it nearby. However, for various reasons – health and safety and slow charging speed amongst them – this is not an ideal solution.
As any EV user can, regardless of where they live, we can also visit a local rapid charge point to “fill-up” the car relatively quickly, at least to an 80% charge. However, this is also not ideal as a primary charging option, not least because rapid chargers will often be around twice as expensive, on a pence per kilowatt hour basis, as charging at home (and considerably more than twice as expensive compared to the cheapest, overnight home charging rates).
In short, our personal experience over the last couple of years points to a need for more to be done to enable people who lack their own off-street parking to have access to local charging options which are broadly comparable, in cost and convenience, to having their own home chargers. It’s therefore great to see that this is one of the main areas of focus for the Action Net Zero campaign that we at TLT are pleased to be supporting.
In particular, it would be great to see some further progress being made in and around Bristol over the next few months on several different solutions for prospective EV users who are concerned about a lack of home charging options. These are:
One of the obvious solutions - widely deployed in parts of London but not so much elsewhere - is for the local council to commission on-street charge points, whether dedicated charge point units or lamp post based. These could be owned by the council itself or the council could allow a private sector company to operate them on a concession basis, where the private sector company funds the installation in return for getting the right to operate the charge points and retain some of the revenue generated from this.
There will be a number of reasons why the rollout of this kind of solution is happening more slowly than lots of prospective EV users would like to see. However, clearly one of the challenges where a council is keen to pass on cost and risk to a private sector company is a concern about utilisation – so how much demand will there actually be for the charge points, once installed, and how long will it therefore take for the company to make a return on its investment?
If nothing else, the Action Net Zero campaign will hopefully provide more data around appetites for switching and, in some areas, provide more comfort to prospective investors about what future customer demand might be.
Another solution is the creation of neighbour to neighbour charge point sharing arrangements, where someone with off-street parking and a charge point allows others in the neighbourhood to make use of that charge point. My sense from conversations with people in my area of Bristol is that some of these arrangements are already starting to happen informally – and Co-Charger, one of the lead sponsors of the Action Net Zero campaign, has a business model that is focussed specifically on helping more of these local neighbourhood based relationships to be created.
These sorts of arrangements shouldn’t throw up any particular legal difficulties. However, one question that has come up more than once in conversations I have had locally is about liability if things go wrong when someone is using a charge point. Over the coming months, TLT, alongside others involved in the campaign, aims to provide guidance on what some of the considerations are here and the role that insurance cover has to play in getting people comfortable with the theoretical risks.
A variation on the neighbour to neighbour theme is for local businesses who have off-street parking to install charge points which can be used by local residents at times when the parking spaces are not needed by the business itself. In some cases, there may be scope for local residents to use spaces during the day. However, it seems to me there is a particular opportunity for spaces which will generally be empty at night to be used for overnight charging by local residents.
Again, in my area of Bristol, conversations have already started about how local people might make use of off-street parking on our local high street for overnight charging purposes. Even a single 7kW charge point, with an installation cost of around one thousand pounds, could support an EV switch by several different people. In other locations, there might be a sound business case for installing a dual socket 22kW charge point and potentially enabling a larger number of local people to get use from that installation over the course of a week.
At a legal level, the business owner may want some assurance – even if funding the charge points themselves - that installing the charge point is not going to cause them to breach any restrictions on how they can use their premises.
In theory, there is also scope for a local business owner who isn’t keen to fund the charge point themselves to allow a third party operator (which might be a dedicated charge point operator business or some kind of community owned enterprise) to be granted a lease or licence allowing the third party to fund, own and operate the charge point at the relevant site.
This article was originally published by Action Net Zero. TLT is supporting a collective of pioneers in climate change solutions to support Action Net Zero in its mission to make Bristol's transport cleaner and greener. TLT, alongside others involved in the campaign, can provide guidance on the issues raised above.
This publication is intended for general guidance and represents our understanding of the relevant law and practice as at July 2021. Specific advice should be sought for specific cases. For more information see our terms & conditions.
14 July 2021