
PRA restates CRR definitions into PRA rulebook: what firms need to know before 1 January 2027
TLT picks out the key points you shouldn't miss...
What's this about?
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has published PS14/26, confirming how Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) definitions will be restated into the PRA Rulebook, alongside updates to SS15/13 (Groups), with effect from 1 January 2027.
While the PRA has adopted a “lift and shift” approach, transferring most definitions without substantive policy change, this should not be treated as a purely technical exercise.
The move from directly applicable CRR text to the PRA Rulebook Glossary, combined with targeted definitional changes and new supervisory expectations, creates a material implementation exercise for firms.
This development is most relevant to:
- PRA-authorised UK banks
- Building societies
- PRA-designated investment firms
- Parent undertakings within prudential groups
However, the impact may extend more widely where definitions affect counterparties and FCA lead regulated counterparties.
Andrzej Wieckowski, Financial Regulation Partner at TLT LLP, says...
"Firms should not underestimate the scale of this change. Although labelled a ‘lift and shift’, the introduction of targeted definitional amendments, new participations guidance and reliance on the corresponding provisions table means these new rules need a careful mapping and interpretation exercise – not just for those who track RWAs but also for those responsible for monitoring minority investments or contemplating M&A on the bank’s balance sheet.
With implementation aligning with Basel 3.1, firms that delay preparation risk facing concentrated compliance pressure across multiple prudential areas."
The points not to miss...
The PRA has sought to preserve continuity, but firms cannot assume mechanical equivalence.
• Definitions have moved location
• Targeted clarifications have been made
• Interpretation now relies on PRA Rulebook context
Appendix 2 maps PRA rules to revoked CRR provisions and is the primary reference tool for continuity of meaning.
Key updates include:
• “Branch” – aligned with CRR wording
• “Recognised exchange” – moved fully into the Glossary, with the previous rulebook part deleted
• Adjustments to regulatory capital-related definitions
Certain CRR elements have been removed where redundant or replaced by PRA supervisory powers.
The PRA has clarified that ECAI nominations for:
• Securitisation exposures; and
• Standardised credit risk exposures
must be distinct and independently maintained.
Despite feedback, the PRA has retained the existing definition, acknowledging that ambiguity may remain.
The PRA has maintained Basel-aligned thresholds but signalled further consultation in 2026 on updating regulatory thresholds (potentially via indexation).
The PRA has amended Article 229(3) to refer explicitly to market value, addressing a previous gap for certain physical collateral types.
Updated and detailed guidance in re-stated SS15/13 to take effect 1 Jan 2027 clarifies when holdings below 20% may constitute a participation, replacing earlier “durable link” guidance.
The PRA has reinforced expectations across:
• Individual consolidation permissions
• Minority interest impacts
• Sub-consolidation structures
• Step in risk assessment
At a glance...
Author: James Greig
This publication is intended for general guidance and represents our understanding of the relevant law and practice as at June 2026. Specific advice should be sought for specific cases. For more information see our terms & conditions.
Get in touch
Related services
Get in touch
Insights & events

FCA AML supervision reform: what law firms, accountants and TCSPs need to do now

FCA money mules review: closing accounts is not enough

FCA Pure Protection Market Study: what firms need to know

FCA Pure Protection Market Study: Fair value findings - what firms need to do

FCA reviews payments firms' support for vulnerable consumers under Consumer Duty

FCA regulation is not a major barrier to SME finance – but challenges remain

AML reform is accelerating: what firms should take from the UK’s 2026–2029 strategy

Tightening the net: rising evasion risks and escalating penalties

The Failure to Prevent Fraud offence – one year on

Open finance meets mortgages: the FCA sets out its vision – but the hard work starts now

Frontier AI and cyber resilience: what financial services firms need to know now

Consumer Credit Act 1974 (CCA) reform: summer recap

FOS confirms major overhaul of the complaints process – what firms need to know

FCA puts asset managers on notice: financial crime controls falling short

Tipping off under POCA: the first Court of Appeal authority arrives

FCA raises the bar on Consumer Duty outcomes monitoring: what your firm needs to do now

%20%C3%94%C3%87%C3%B4%20790px%20X%20451px%2072ppi.jpg)


%20790px%20X%20451px%2072ppi.jpg)

%20%C3%94%C3%87%C3%B4%20790px%20X%20451px%2072ppi21.jpg)
%20%C3%94%C3%87%C3%B4%20790px%20X%20451px%2072ppi.jpg)
%20%C3%94%C3%87%C3%B4%20790px%20X%20451px%2072ppi.jpg)


%20%C3%94%C3%87%C3%B4%20790px%20X%20451px%2072ppi2.jpg)


%20%E2%80%93%20790px%20X%20451px%2072ppi%20LONDON9.jpg)


