Press enter to search, esc to close
As ESG escalates up the corporate agenda, a key challenge for Boards who are advocating the proactive management of ESG-related risks, is managing and assessing the impact of the actions of other parties through commercial arrangements.
As reporting requirements increase, it's becoming progressively necessary to encourage suppliers to adhere to these standards through contractual agreements. Certain ESG-related terms, such as anti-bribery and modern slavery, are already commonly included in commercial contracts. This is largely due to the Bribery Act 2010 and the Modern Slavery Act 2015 (respectively) placing statutory obligations upon companies and increasing the risk profile in these areas.
The FCA has also been active on ESG issues, requiring many regulated entities to adopt new procedures and comply with certain sustainability disclosure requirements.
However, while many ESG requirements are becoming increasingly baked into companies’ governance, in the absence of regulatory or statutory requirements there is still real inconsistency with how companies capture these requirements (if at all) in their commercial contracts.
Compliance with ESG obligations are commonly captured in commercial contracts through obligations to comply with customer/supplier policies. Many companies have supplier conduct policies, or similar, that set out ESG expectations including:
However, such policies and codes of conduct are not legally binding on their own. An obligation in a contract requiring compliance with policies generally, or a specific code of conduct, will be binding, but these policies are often broad in scope which can limit actionable consequences for breaches. If compliance is key to the proper performance of a contract, a stronger approach will be to include specific ESG clauses in the contract.
The type and implementation of ESG clauses can vary considerably from one contract to another depending on several factors, including a company’s size, domestic laws, supplier networks, disclosure levels, and the nature of the transaction. For example, due diligence might uncover that the supplier works with a network of organisations, making compliance down the supply chain a priority. Similarly, domestic laws differ significantly, and so where suppliers are employing workers internationally, ensuring they are contractually bound to provide acceptable working conditions (in the absence of comparable laws in other countries) becomes vital. The depth of such ESG clauses is also dependent on comparable factors, as well as the necessary disclosure levels, and the nature of the contract.
Parties may also wish to consider structuring the commercial mechanics around a contract to put ESG as a high priority in the overall deal.
When considering what clauses might need to be included in contracts, companies should consider their own policies and targets and work out what specific obligations a supplier would need to adhere to in order to support those plans.
The Chancery Lane Project, a charity dedicated to reducing emissions through legal documents and processes, offers clause suggestions across different jurisdictions and legal areas. We have collaborated with this charity for several years to promote climate conscious drafting, working on precedent clauses and incorporating them in our client contracts where appropriate.
The level of risks associated with lack of compliance from suppliers with ESG factors will vary. Future energy companies might have a particular interest in emissions data and net-zero targets, while retail businesses might focus on green claims following the Competition and Markets Authority’s (CMA) increased powers under the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 (read our Green Claims Outlook 2025 for more information).
Ultimately, there are overarching risks which will be considered across most boardrooms:
Undertaking a thorough review will identify gaps in contractual arrangements, helping to inform the steps needed to contractually align the supply chain with customer requirements or internal standards.
Collaboration with other business can enhance sustainable and ethical practices. Forming ESG-focused relationships is critical to the implementation of a wider ESG-strategy.
Whilst it is difficult to predict the path ESG-related laws will take, trends in regulatory enforcement make it clear that ESG will remain a priority, and scrutiny will only expand from consumers (because of increased online activity and information sharing), regulators and investors alike. Accordingly, an organisation’s compliance will become increasingly influenced by the nature of its relationships with others.
Proactively managing these relationships can minimise ESG-related risks and keep companies ahead of compliance demands. Contractual obligations should require suppliers to meet the necessary standards and provide accurate data for reporting. Alternatively, if supplier codes of conduct are to be used as the primary tool for ESG compliance, these should clearly detail a company’s requirements and include tangible and measurable obligations as how they are expected to be met. They will also need to be properly incorporated by reference into contracts, allowing for updates as these policies may develop.
Get in touch with TLT’s Commercial team for support with managing risk, drafting supplier codes of conduct, or embedding ESG-related compliance into commercial contracts.
Co-author: Meghan Sugrue, Trainee, Commercial team
This publication is intended for general guidance and represents our understanding of the relevant law and practice as at March 2025. Specific advice should be sought for specific cases. For more information see our terms and conditions.
Date published
20 March 2025
RELATED INSIGHTS AND EVENTS
View allRELATED SERVICES